Russian Federation
A large number of teams and teams include representatives of different generations who have different views on the organization of work and interaction. In this regard, conflicts and contradictions often arise. For the most effective functioning of such teams and collectives, it is necessary to take into account the characteristics and motivating factors of different generations. An analysis of the activities of foreign and Russian companies, including Google, IBM, Unilever, Oil Energy, Komus Logistics Center, Tochka Bank and others, has revealed practices that promote effective interaction between representatives of different generations in collaboration. Among them are the use of platforms for the exchange of knowledge and experience between employees of different generations; the organization and conduct of trainings on the development of communication skills and conflict management; cultural events that introduce employees to the traditions and values of different generations; facilitation, etc.
generations, intergenerational teams, millennials, motivating factors, facilitation
1. Vishnevskiy Yu.R., Didkovskaya Ya.V., Pevnaya M.V. Problemy professional'nogo samoopredeleniya molodezhi: analiz cennostnyh orientaciy i professional'nyh strategiy // Informacionno-analiticheskiy otchet. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2011. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QONLAP
2. Voznesenskiy I.V. Vozmozhnosti fasilitacii dlya optimizacii vremeni proizvodstvennyh soveschaniy // Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii. 2024. Tom. 13. № 6. Str. 20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2024-13-6-20-25; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOECLC
3. Demin A.N. Osobennosti formirovaniya trudovogo soznaniya molodezhi (1995 – 2001 gody), doklad // Internet — konferenciya «Poisk effektivnyh institutov dlya Rossii XXI veka». 2003.
4. Zacepin D. «Mnogie mechtayut vnedrit' samoupravlenie, no ne reshayutsya — mol, lyudi nezrelye. Vse eto otgovorki». URL: https://big-i.ru/liderstvo/lidery/862092/
5. Kosharnyy V. P., Korzh N. V Trudovye cennosti i ustanovki studencheskoy molodezhi // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obschestvennye nauki. 2012. № 1 (21). S. 127.
6. Magun V.S Struktura i dinamika trudovyh cennostey rossiyskogo naseleniya // Rossiya: transformiruyuscheesya obschestvo / Pod redakciey V.A. Yadova. M.: Izdatel'stvo «KANON-press-C», 2001. S.3- 4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SYXHHZ
7. Martynova A.V. Fasilitaciya kak tehnologiya organizacionnogo razvitiya i izmeneniy // Organizacionnaya psihologiya. 2011. T.1 № 2. S.53-91. S.58. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TOQSCF
8. Molchanov I. Fasilitaciya sotrudnichestva. Sozdanie cennosti v gruppovyh processah. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Materialy kursa «Fasilitaciya sotrudnichestva». 2024. S. 43. URL: https://fasilika.ru/master
9. Novoe issledovanie Hays: pokolenie Z. Data publikacii: 10.06.2019. Data obrascheniya: 06.12.2024. URL: https://hr-elearning.ru/novoe-issledovanie-hays-2019-pokolenie-z/
10. Savel'eva M.V. Rabota v radost' ili chto luchshie v mire rabotodateli delayut dlya svoih sotrudnikov // Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii. Tom: 12, Nomer: 3 God: 2023 Str. 64-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2023.12.10.007
11. Chiksentmihayi M. Potok: Psihologiya optimal'nogo perezhivaniya. M.: Smysl; Al'pina non-fikshn, 2015. S.90-113.
12. Schennikova M. Trudovye cennosti v pokolencheskom analize: sravnenie pokoleniy H, U i Z. Data publikacii: 15.06.2015. Data obrascheniya: 06.12.2024. URL: https://thewallmagazine.ru/generation-analysis-x-y-z/
13. 2016 American Investor Report, 2016, Scottrade Inc.
14. Bens I. Facilitating with Ease! San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
15. Brave new workplace, 2017, INSEAD.
16. Bumbuc S., Macovei C.M. Diferențe între generații în abordarea de către personalul military a formării profesionale continue. Gândirea militară românească.1/2021: pp. 194 -207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55535/GMR.2021.1.13
17. Discanno F. The impact of technological progress on the different generations of workers in the European banking industry: the central role of social dialogue to promote age diversity management and knowledge transfer. Academia Letters, article 1071/2021. Rezhim dostupa: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1071. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RHODWZ
18. Employment and unemployment of seniors in 2016, 2016, DARES results.
19. InterGen Lab, 2015, Observatory of Inter-generational Management.
20. Iorgulescu, M.C. Generation Z and its Perception of Work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal. XVIII, 1(9)/2016: pp. 47-54.
21. Jurkiewicz, Carole L. Generation X and the Public Employee // Public Personnel Management. March, vol. 29 no. 1 P. 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900105
22. Justice T., Jamieson D.W. The Facilitator's Fieldbook. HRD Press, Inc, 2006.
23. Lim H. L. Attracting and retaining Generation Y engineering and business professionals in the Middle-east. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 62/2012: pp. 25-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.006
24. Raiu S.L. Generațiile X, Y și Z pe piața muncii. Caracteristici specifice, strategii de implicare în învățarea activă și abordări ale relației managerilor cu angajații. Sociologie Românească. Volume 19, Issue 2/2021: pp. 89-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33788/sr.19.2.4; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VZDQLR
25. Retirement: Is 75 the new 65, 2015, YourWorkplace.
26. Seemiller C., Grace M. Generation Z: A Century in the Making. Taylor & Francis. Group: ProQuest EbookCentral; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442476
27. Smeak R. Safety in the Multigenerational Workplace. Professional Safety. Volume 65, no.05/2020: pp. 22-27.
28. Smeak R. Safety in the Multigenerational Workplace. Professional Safety. Volume 65, no.05/2020: pp. 22-27.
29. Tolbize A. Generational differences in the workplace. Rezhim dostupa: https://rtc.umn.edu/docs/2_18_Gen_diff_workplace.pdf
30. Warner J., Sandberg A. Generational Leadership. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.kiwata.com/pdf/Generational-Leadership.pdf
