«DNA of Russia» project (Scientific Director)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
UDK 338.242.4 Государственное вмешательство в рыночную экономику
The purpose of this work is the author's assessment of the measures taken by the authorities aimed at the formation of technological sovereignty as part of a new economic and political model of society. The article is based on the principles of system analysis, the methods of factor analysis and logical modeling are also used. Based on the theoretical and empirical studies conducted, it is shown that technological sovereignty is a relatively new category, the study of which should be carried out at the intersection of political and economic sciences. In economic terms, technological sovereignty is based on the ability of the state to create critical, promising technologies and organize production based on them. It is revealed that the formation of technological sovereignty requires state participation in the economy. In particular, in such areas as planning technological and industrial development, identifying priority areas of research and production and forming a list of critical technologies, financing priority areas and projects, creating institutional conditions for technological development, protecting national researchers and manufacturers, developing science and education, etc. The analysis showed that currently work has begun in the country in almost all these areas, but most often not actively enough. It is concluded that these aspects of state participation can be represented as elements of an emerging new economic model that strengthens the regulatory role of the state in the economy, while preserving the basic principles and niches for market relations.
new economic model, critical technologies, planning, state corporation
1. Balatskiy E.V., Ekimova N.A. Al'ternativnaya model' upravleniya innovatsiyami i vysokotekhnologicheskim sektorom ekonomiki Rossii [Alternative model of innovation management and high-tech sector of the Russian economy]. Upravlenets [The Manager]. 2020, V. 11, I. 5, pp. 2-16, DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-5-1 (In Russian).
2. Bodrunov S. D. Sovremennaya strategiya razvitiya trebuet povorota k planirovaniyu [Modern development strategy requires a turn to planning]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The Economic Revival of Russia]. 2021, V. 3, pp. 5-13, DOI:https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-3-69-5-13 (In Russian).
3. Vlaskin G.A. Diversifikatsiya OPK kak prioritetnoe napravlenie postroeniya vysokotekhnologichnoy otechestvennoy promyshlennosti [Diversification of the defense industry as a priority direction for building a high-tech domestic industry] Vestnik IE RAN [Bulletin of the IE RAS]. 2019, V.5, pp. 97-113, DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10061 (In Russian).
4. Volodenkov S.V. i dr. Novye sub"ekty i tekhnologii gosudarstvennoy politiki: aktual'naya praktika i perspektivy [New subjects and technologies of public policy: current practice and prospects]. Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy [Journal of Political Research]. 2021, V. 5, I. 1, pp. 65-91, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2021-5-1-65-91 (In Russian).
5. Glaz'ev S.Yu. O mekhanizmakh realizatsii tseley natsional'nogo razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh smeny tekhnologicheskikh i mirokhozyaystvennykh ukladov [About the mechanisms of realization of the goals of national development of Russia in the conditions of changing technological and world economic patterns]. Nauchnye trudy VEO Rossii [Scientific works of the VEO of Russia]. 2021, V. 230, pp.66-70, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-230-4-66-70 (In Russian).
6. Zemtsov S.P., Chernov A.V. Kakie vysokotekhnologichnye kompanii v Rossii rastut bystree i pochemu [Which high-tech companies in Russia are growing faster and why] Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association]. 2019, V.1, pp. 68-99, DOI:https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2019-41-1-3 (In Russian).
7. Kvint V. L., Novikova I. V., Alimuradov M. K., Sasaev N. I. Strategirovanie tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta natsional'noy ekonomik [Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty] Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Administrative consulting]. 2022, I. 9, pp. 57-67, DOI:https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67 (In Russian).
8. Klepach A.N. Sotsial'nyy i innovatsionnyy povorot rossiyskoy ekonomiki: plany i real'nost' [Social and innovative turn of the Russian economy: plans and reality]. Nauchnye trudy VEO Rossii [Scientific works of the VEO of Russia]. 2021, V. 227, pp. 30-91, DOI:https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-30-91(In Russian).
9. Kuznetsov N.V., Kotova N.E. Ispol'zovanie instituta gosudarstvennykh korporatsiy dlya obespecheniya ekonomicheskogo rosta [Using the Institute of State corporations to ensure economic growth]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research]. 2020, V 8, pp. 40-44 (In Russian).
10. Lugacheva L. I. Vysokotekhnologicheskie i naukoemkie proizvodstva: transformatsiya sistemy upravleniya aktivami i novye biznes-strategii (na primere GK «Rostekh») [High-tech and high-tech industries: transformation of the asset management system and new business strategies (on the example of Rostec State Corporation)]. Mir novoy ekonomiki [World of New Economy]. 2021, V.15, I. 4, pp. 88-99, DOI:https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-4-88-99 (In Russian).
11. Mailyan S.S. O nekotorykh aspektakh ekonomicheskoy sushchnosti gosudarstvennykh korporatsiy [On some aspects of the economic essence of state corporations]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Bulletin of Economic Security]. 2019, V. 4, pp. 314-317, DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2414-3995-2019-10264 (In Russian).
12. Nazarov V.P., Afinogenov D.A. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v Rossii: novyy etap razvitiya [Strategic planning in Russia: a new stage of development] Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies]. 2022, I. 4, pp. 32-46, DOI:https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.04.04 (In Russian).
13. Nikolaychuk I.A., Yanglyaeva M.M., Yakova T.S. Natsionalizm ili globalizm? Novaya staraya dilemma mirovoy politiki [Nationalism or globalism? The new old dilemma of world politics] Problemy natsional'noy strategii [Problems of national Strategy]. 2021, I. 2, pp. 51-69, DOI:https://doi.org/10.52311/2079-3359_2021_2_51 (In Russian).
14. Orekhova S. V., Kislitsyn E. V. Sovokupnaya proizvoditel'nost' faktorov v promyshlennosti Rossii: malye vs krupnye predpriyatiya [Aggregate factor productivity in Russian industry: small vs large enterprises]. Journal of New Economy [Journal of New Economy]. 2019, V. 20, I. 2, pp. 127-144, DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-2-8 (In Russian).
15. Parma R.V. Politicheskie instituty i ekonomicheskiy rost: issledovaniya vzaimosvyazi [Political institutions and economic Growth: Studies of interconnection]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science]. 2021, I. 2, pp. 13-41, DOI:https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.02.01 (In Russian).
16. Perskaya V.V, Revenko N.S. «Sdelano v Kitae 2025»: kitayskiy opyt obespecheniya zadach natsional'nogo razvitiya ["Made in China 2025": Chinese experience in ensuring the tasks of national development] Aziya i Afrika segodnya [Asia and Africa today]. 2020, I. 7, pp.19-25, DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750010100-2.
17. Polterovich V.M. Razrabotka strategiy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: nauka vs ideologiya [Development of socio-economic development strategies: science vs ideology] VTE [VTE]. 2017, I.1, pp. 055-065 (In Russian).
18. Sukharev O.S. Strategiya razvitiya i planirovanie v Rossii: printsipy i ekonomicheskaya politika [Development strategy and planning in Russia: principles and economic policy] Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. «Ekonomika» [Bulletin of Perm University. Ser. "Economics”] 2016, I. 3, pp. 25-43, DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2016-3-25-43 (In Russian).
19. Tolkachev S. A., Teplyakov A. Yu., Normova Yu. V. Planirovanie i promyshlennaya politika v epokhu perekhoda k NIO.2 [Planning and industrial policy in the era of transition to Research and Development] Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia]. 2021, I. 3, pp.72-81, DOI:https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-3-69-72-81 (In Russian).
20. Faykov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. Gosudarstvennaya korporatsiya - inkubator krupnykh biznesov [State Corporation - incubator of large businesses] Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' [Economic security]. 2022, V. 5, I. 3, pp. 927-950, DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec. 5.3.114827 (In Russian).
21. Faykov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. Diversifikatsiya v atomnoy otrasli: sovremennoe sostoyanie, osobennosti, perspektivy [Diversification in the nuclear industry: current state, features, prospects] Nauchnyy vestnik oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii [Scientific Bulletin of the Military-industrial complex of Russia]. 2021, I. 2, pp. 41-49 (In Russian).
22. Faykov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. Osobennosti organizatsiya proizvodstva grazhdanskoy produktsii v natsional'nykh laboratoriyakh SShA [Features of the organization of production of civilian products in the national laboratories of the USA] Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. [Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin]. 2020, I. 8, pp. 40-62. Available at: http://www.rfej.ru/rvv/id/D00316815 (In Russian).
23. Caglar K., Bitzinger. R. Defense industries in the 21-st century: A comparative analysis - The second e-workshop. Comparative Strategy. 2018, V. 37, I. 4, pp. 255-259, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2018.1497318.
24. Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., Salvatori C. European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy. Intereconomics, 2021, I. 6, rp. 348-354, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6.
25. Couture, S., & Toupin, S. What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 2019, V. 21, I. 10, pp. 2305-2322, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984.
26. Higgons R., Cubitt. A. Diversification by Defence Companies into Civil Markets. Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategic Drivers. - Qi3, 2013. Available at: http://www.qi3.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Diversification-by-Defence-Companies-into-Civil-Markets.pdf (Accessed: 22.01.2023).
27. Luo Y. Illusions of techno-nationalism, Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, I. 53, pp. 550-567, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00468-5.
28. Manning R. A Techno-Nationalism vs. the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Asia, 2019, V. 14, I. 1, pp.14-21. Available at: https://www.globalasia.org/v14no1/cover/techno-nationalism-vs-the-fourth-industrial-revolution_robert-a-manning (Accessed: 20.01.2023).
29. March, C., Schieferdecker, I. Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky. CESifo Working Paper, 2021. I. 9139, DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3872378
30. Maurer T., Skierka I., Morgus R. and Hohmann M. "Technological sovereignty: Missing the point?" 7th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Architectures in Cyberspace, 2015, pp. 53-68, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CYCON.2015.7158468.
31. Reich R. The Rise of Techno-nationalism. The Atlantic. 1987. May.
